For Philippine companies operating in sectors such as BPO, fintech, SaaS, healthcare, and cloud services, SOC 2 certification is quickly becoming a non-negotiable trust requirement. International clients now expect vendors to prove that their systems, policies, and controls meet global security standards before sharing sensitive data or outsourcing critical workflows.
This brings us to one of the most common questions raised by PH businesses starting their compliance journey:
“Do we need SOC 2 Type I or SOC 2 Type II first?”
Understanding the difference between the two can help you plan properly, avoid unnecessary delays, and show clients that your organization takes security seriously.
This guide breaks down the key differences, timelines, benefits, and practical steps to help Philippine companies decide which SOC 2 report to pursue first.
What Is SOC 2 and Why Do PH Companies Need It?
SOC 2 (Service Organization Control 2) is an auditing framework developed by the AICPA. It evaluates how effectively a service organization manages security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy—the five Trust Services Criteria (TSC).
For PH companies, a SOC 2 report serves as:
-
A credibility signal that aligns you with global data protection expectations
-
A requirement for partnerships with US, EU, and APAC clients
-
A risk management tool that reduces exposure to breaches and operational gaps
-
A competitive advantage over vendors who cannot demonstrate compliance
To achieve SOC 2, companies undergo a third-party audit where controls are evaluated and validated against AICPA standards. The audit output comes in two formats: SOC 2 Type I and SOC 2 Type II.
SOC 2 Type I vs SOC 2 Type II: The Core Difference
Although both reports evaluate the same set of controls, they differ in purpose and depth.
SOC 2 Type I: A Snapshot
-
Evaluates design and readiness of security controls
-
Assesses controls at a single point in time
-
Proves that your controls exist and are properly designed
-
Faster to complete (typically 4–8 weeks)
-
Often used as a starting point or to satisfy early-stage client requirements
SOC 2 Type II: A Long-Term Operational Proof
-
Evaluates design and operating effectiveness
-
Audits controls over a period of 3–12 months
-
Demonstrates that controls not only exist but also work consistently
-
Takes longer and requires maturity in processes
-
Considered the gold standard for security assurance
In short:
Type I = Are your controls designed well?
Type II = Do those controls work in real life over time?
Why International Clients Care About SOC 2 in the Philippines
More PH companies are being asked for SOC 2 compliance for several reasons:
-
Data outsourcing growth – US and EU companies require security assurance before entrusting customer data offshore.
-
Rise of cloud-based BPO and SaaS providers – Secure digital operations are now baseline requirements.
-
Stricter due diligence – Clients want evidence that your processes are stable, repeatable, and monitored.
-
Increased cybersecurity risks – Remote work and distributed teams require stronger controls.
Understanding which report to prioritize can help PH businesses close deals faster and mature their security posture strategically.
Which Do PH Companies Need First: SOC 2 Type I or SOC 2 Type II?
For most organizations, SOC 2 Type I comes first—and for very practical reasons. However, the right answer depends on your maturity level, client pressure, and stage of business growth.
Below is a clear decision guide.
When PH Companies Should Start With SOC 2 Type I
1. You Need a Certificate Quickly to Satisfy Clients
Clients often ask for proof of SOC 2 compliance before onboarding a new vendor.
A Type I report is faster and can serve as evidence that you are on the compliance pathway.
2. Your Processes Are Defined but Not Fully Mature
If your policies, onboarding flows, access controls, incident response processes, and monitoring systems are established but still being refined, Type I is the ideal starting point.
3. You’re a Startup or Early-Stage SaaS
Young companies typically benefit from a Type I report because:
-
It’s cost-effective
-
It shows early commitment to security
-
It helps unlock partnerships and investments
4. You Want to Build Momentum Before the Longer Type II Audit
Type II requires 3–12 months of evidence.
A Type I gives you time to prepare and correct gaps before committing to the longer audit window.
When PH Companies Should Go Straight to SOC 2 Type II
1. Your Clients Explicitly Require Type II
Many enterprise clients, especially in finance, insurance, and healthcare, skip Type I entirely and demand Type II for vendor approval.
2. You Already Have Mature Security Controls Running
If you have monitoring, logs, automated alerts, employee training documentation, access reviews, and risk assessments consistently implemented, you may be ready to jump directly to Type II.
3. You Want Long-Term Contract Eligibility
Large US clients typically view Type II as the real proof of compliance.
4. You’re in a competitive bid or RFP process
Type II gives you a significant advantage in procurement evaluations.
How Philippine Companies Typically Progress
Most PH companies follow this natural compliance roadmap:
Step 1: Gap Assessment
Identify what controls you already have and what you need to implement.
Step 2: SOC 2 Type I Audit
Demonstrates readiness and builds market trust quickly.
Step 3: Audit Period for SOC 2 Type II
Operate controls consistently for 3–12 months.
Step 4: SOC 2 Type II Audit
Provides long-term compliance assurance.
This staged approach minimizes operational friction and spreads costs over manageable phases.
What Type I and Type II Have in Common
Both reports cover the same Trust Services Criteria:
-
Security (mandatory)
-
Availability
-
Processing integrity
-
Confidentiality
-
Privacy
The difference lies only in how and over what time period the controls are validated.
Common Misconceptions in PH Companies About SOC 2
“Type I is enough for enterprise clients.”
Not always. It works for initial due diligence, but large clients almost always expect Type II.
“Type II is too difficult for PH companies.”
Not true. With proper preparation and tooling, PH organizations routinely complete Type II audits.
“We can delay compliance until clients ask for it.”
By the time a client demands SOC 2, you may not have time to prepare. The earlier you start, the better your odds of winning contracts.
“SOC 2 is only for tech companies.”
Many PH BPOs, shared service centers, accounting firms, and payment processors now need SOC 2 to meet international expectations.
Which Should You Get First?
Here’s the straightforward answer:
Start with SOC 2 Type I if:
-
You need compliance quickly
-
You’re early in security maturity
-
You want to close deals faster
-
You need time to operationalize controls
Aim for SOC 2 Type II if:
-
You serve enterprise clients
-
Your controls are already consistent
-
You went through Type I and are ready for longer validation
-
You want the highest level of assurance and competitive positioning
Final Recommendation for PH Companies
For most organizations comparing SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2 Philippines, the practical sequence is:
1. Complete SOC 2 Type I
2. Strengthen processes during a 3–12 month observation period
3. Complete SOC 2 Type II for long-term assurance
This pathway satisfies immediate client expectations while ensuring you build a mature, sustainable security posture aligned with international standards. Global Quality Services offers the best solutions for businesses in the Philippines.
